|
|
Description:
|
ANSI X9.62 Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) signatures and modules
|
|
Information:
|
From: Phillip H. Griffin
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003
Cc: Don Johnson, Jeff Stapleton, Pud Reaver
OID repository admin wrote:
-----
the following OID was described as:
OID: {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) ansi-x962(10045) signatures(4) ecdsa-with-SHA1(1)}
Description: ANSI X9.62 ECDSA signatures with SHA-1 in the OID repository.
In one of the files available on your website, we've found the following information:
OID: {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) 10045 module(4) 1}
Description: Modules
Registrant : "X9F"
Which one is right? "module " or "signatures "?
-----
Both ;)
I made an error in writing the X9.62 ASN.1 and assigned this OID twice, once to the module OID and again to the signatures. Best to let signatures win, as these actually have an effect on products and code, and change the module assignment from:
ANSI-X9-62 {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) 10045 module(4) 1}
and
ANSI-X9-62 {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) 10045 module(4) 2}
to
ANSI-X9-62 {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) 10045 module(5) 1}
and
ANSI-X9-62 {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) 10045 module(5) 2}
I'll contact by Cc some "X9F" chairs and get them to ask Miles Smid to get this changed to {iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) ansi-x962(10045) module(5)} in the next X9.62 revision.
|
|
Disclaimer: The owner of this site does not warrant or assume any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information available on this page (for more information, please read the complete disclaimer).
All rights reserved © 2007-2025 |